Give me 100 reasons why we shall vote for a new government?

Liberal Politica 4 Comments »

To all like-minded anak Bangsa Malaysia:

Your voice must be heard! Please leave your comment!

An UntoldCityLife.com’s Liberal Politica by Xiao Loong Zi

Warning! By reading this post or leaving your comment, you might get me or yourself into many political troubles! (People should not be afraid of their government. governments should be afraid of their people). However, if you insisting reading and leaving your comment, please be more constructive rather then being too emotional. You are freely to against or support “Give me 100 reasons why we shall vote for a new government?”




Tell me what is your reason??Well I may not have 100 reasons to tell but I would like to hear it from all of you. Whether you are supporting or objecting it, you are very much welcome to the world of “network effect”. Share this with your friends and encourage them to vote at below poll!



Recalling my top 10 reasons why I want a new government?

1. Extreme high and alarming “corruption in abuse of money and power” among civil servants as seen frequently on major newspapers!

 

Or click here to read about

2. Justice in this country cannot be trusted completely because it is not administered according to the Law and Constitution as written in his book “Judging the Judges” by former Court of Appeal Judge N.H. Chan.

 

Or right click and open a new window here to read about what Jeff Ooi is saying?

3. The infamous arrest of 106 people under Internal Security Act - Operation Lalang in 1987 - without any trail in the court

4. The extremist and radical racist politicians who destroyed our “Baba Malaysia” Tunku’s vision of Bangsa Malaysia.

Or right click and open a new window here to read What is 50th years of Merdeka to you ?

5. The dropping of competitiveness of the country in the world due to the extreme pro-bumiputera economic policy

6. The case of May 13 riot planned by radical racists that killed many races and forced Tunku to loss his leadership & power as a Prime Minister at that time.

7. The many cases of demolition of temples - religious intolerance in the country and it is considered against the constitution.

 

 

8. Many of the civil servants like the ex Menteri Besar of Selangor was not arrested in Malaysia eventhough he was found carrying exceeding money (in millions) to Australia

9. The terrible transportation systems in the country is making us suffering and sucking our hard earned money.

10. Well I am at doubt at their education qualifications! Compare the education qualification of Singapore cabinets and Malaysia !


Now please cast your vote here!

 

Read “Liberal Political” or The People’s Parliament

Popularity: 58% [?]

When is the next 12th general election in Malaysia? Dec 2007?

Liberal Politica 1 Comment »

This is a rumour hearing from friends!

An UntoldCityLife.com’s Liberal Politica by Xiao Loong Zi

Disclaimer: Information on this post is not authenticated!




People are saying that the 12th general election will be held this year most probably in December. And when would it be then? Could it be any date within November or December 2007?

Why?

Because UMNO is going to held a General Assembly in November. So usually Parliament is dismissed thereafter. Also, by next year, Anwar would regain his civil rights to contest in the election. So I don’t think the ruling party wants the election to be held after he regained his civil rights.

… and bla bla bla …


Well when is the election is not that important! What matter us most is, have you decided who you wanna vote for? Are you looking for a revolution change? Or are you just use to what you been reading and hearing on the newspaper everyday and then?

Something you need to do and decide carefully. Your single vote is important, and the future is in your hands!

Read “Liberal Political” or The People’s Parliament

Popularity: 62% [?]

Singapore Cabinet vs Malaysia Cabinet (A comparison)

Liberal Politica, Uncategorized 9 Comments »

Comparing Singaporean and Malaysian

An UntoldCityLife.com’s Liberal Politica by Xiao Loong Zi

Disclaimer: Below is a copy of email forwarded from an unknown. UntoldCityLife.com and its authors have not verified the truthfulness of below anonymous article. Please help to verify and comment 

************* start ***********

Singapore Cabinet Malaysia Cabinet
PM Lee Hsien Loong
Cambridge University - First Class Honours (1974)
Harvard University - Masters (1980)
PM Abdullah bin Haji Ahmad Badawi
University of Malaya - Bachelor of Arts Honours (1964)
SM Goh Chok Tong
University of Singapore - First Class Honours (1964)
Williams College , USA - Masters (1967)
Deputy PM Dato’ Sri Najib Razak
University of Nottingham - Bachelor of Arts Honours (1974)
MM Lee Kuan Yew
Cambridge University - First Class Honours (1949)
Minister of Foregn Affairs Syed Hamid Albar
(Education Unknown) Bachelor of Arts [ UITM ]
Minister for Law Prof. S Jayakumar
University of Singapore - Bachelor of Law Honours (1963)
Yale Univerity - Masters (1966)
Ministry of Works- Dato’ Seri Samy Vellu
(Education Unknown) [ Form 6, Anderson School ]
Minister for Home Affairs Wong Kan Seng
University of Singapore - Bachelor of Arts & Business Admin (1977)
London Business School - Masters (1979)
Ministry of International Trade & Industry Rafidah binti Aziz
Universiti Malaya - Bachelor of Arts Honours
Minister for Foreign Affairs BG George Yeo
Cambridge University - Double First Class Honours (1976)
Harvard Business School - MBA w/ Distinction (1985)
Minister of Agriculture Muhyiddin Yassin
(Education Unknown) [ Polytechnic Ungku Omar ]
Minister for Trade and Industry Lim Hng Kiang
Cambridge University - First Class Honours w/ Distinction (1976)
Harvard University - Masters (1986)
Ministry of Domestic Trade Shafie Apdal
(Education Unknown) [ Form 5, Failed English ]
Minister for Defence Teo Chee Hean
University of Manchester - First Class Honours (1976)
Imperial College, London - Masters w/ Distinction (1977)
Minister of Education Hishammuddin Hussein
(Education Unknown) [ Bachelor of Arts, Social Science ]
Minister for Education Tharman Shanmugaratnam
London School of Economics - Bachelor of Arts
Cambridge University - Masters
Harvard University - Masters
Minister of Home Affairs Radzi bin Sheikh Ahmad
(Education Unknown) [ Kolej Islam Malaysia , Diploma ]

That is why they are so desperate to get Khairy Jamaluddin up so fast, because he is from Cambridge. 

************************  end  ******************

If you like to read more about Liberal Politica in this blog, please click “here

Popularity: 100% [?]

Allowances for the “Agong” and “Permaisuri” (Allowances for King and Queen)

Liberal Politica 5 Comments »

Is this true?

An UntoldCityLife.com’s Liberal Politica by Xiao Loong Zi

Disclaimer: Below is a copy of email forwarded from an unknown. UntoldCityLife.com and its authors have not verified the truthfulness of below anonymous article. Please help to verify and comment
Elaun untuk Agong dan Permaisuri Agong

Ini adalah dibawah Undang-undang Malaysia Akta 269 (Akta Peruntukan Diraja 1982).

Ini budget tahunan untuk Agong. Akan dibayar secara bulanan kepada Agong. Selain dari elaun untuk Agong ni, mereka masih dapat elaun Sultan di negeri masing-masing.

1. Privy Purse - RM360,000 (bermakna bulanan adalah RM30,000).
2. Elaun keraian - RM120,000 (bulanan sebanyak RM10,000)
3. Elaun diraja Istana Negara - RM144,000 (bulanan sebanyak RM12,000)
So, total setiap bulan seorang Agong dapat adalah sebanyak RM52,000.

Elaun untuk Permaisuri Agong ialah

1. Privy Purse - RM67,200 (iaitu RM5,600 sebulan).

2. Elaun keraian - RM21,600 (RM1,800 sebulan).

Total sebulan Permaisuri Agong dapat ialah RM7,400.

Selain daripada tu, setiap tahun Agong dapat lebih RM53 million untuk perbelanjaan istana, sambutan tetamu dan untuk gaji pekerja dia. Breakdownya adalah seperti berikut

1. Perbelanjaan istana dan sambutan tetamu - RM52,259,100

2. Gaji kakitangan istana - RM1,004,880

3. Elaun untuk bekas Agong dan bekas Permaisuri Agong

Anda tau tak wujud nya elaun ni. Bermakna setiap bekas Agong yang tukar

setiap 5 tahun tu akan dapat elaun bekas Agong dan bekas Permaisuri Agong. Ini adalah dibawah peruntukan Undang-undang Malaysia Akta 270 (Akta Istana Negara Elaun-elaun Diraja 1982) pindaan 2006.

Dibawah akta ni elaun akan dibayar kepada bekas Agong dan bekas Permaisuri Agong setiap bulan untuk seumur hidup. Contoh nya lah kan, macam Sultan Azlan (bekas Agong), selain dari elaun Sultan dia dapat tiap bulan, dia juga dapat elaun bekas Agong.

1. Elaun Diraja Istana Negara untuk bekas Agong - RM15,180 sebulan.

2. Elaun Diraja Istana Negara untuk bekas Permaisuri Agong - RM4,500 sebulan.

Boleh dikatakan kat Malaysiani kebanyakan Sultan dah pun jadi Agong, just imagine berapa banyak kerajaan belanjakan untuk kesemua bekas-bekas Agong dan bekas-bekas Permaisuri Agong yang masih hidup?

Pencen khas untuk balu Agong
Ini adalah pencen untuk balu Agong. Bermakna kalau Agong tu mati semasa dia tengah jadi Agong, so balu dia akan dapat pencen ni. Contohnya pencen khas
Ini Siti Aishah dapat sebab Sultan Selangor mati masa tu dia tengah jadi agong kan. Kira untung lah Siti Aishah ni sebab dapat pencen khas. Anyway, ini adalah di bawah Undang-undang Malaysia Akta 223 (Akta Pencen Khas Raja Permaisuri Agong 1979).

So, ini lah yang Siti Aishah dapat.

1. Pencen seumur hidup - RM4,500 sebulan.
2. Kereta (cukai jalan dan bayaran pendaftaran percuma) atau wang pukal RM250,000 untuk kereta. Juga dapat RM2,590.87 sebulan untuk driver dan maintenance of car.

3. Rumah Kerajaan yang akan disenggara oleh Kerajaan atau wang pukal RM750,000.

Elaun Sultan dan kerabat (contoh Kedah)

Elaun untuk Sultan dan kerabat kat setiap negeri adalah dibawah peruntukan negeri masing-masing. Setiap negeri ada Enakmen Peruntukan Diraja. Ini ontoh untuk Kedah. Basically, kat negeri negeri lain pun lebih kurang sama juga amount nya.
1. Elaun Sultan - RM52,600 sebulan.
2. Elaun keraian Sultan = RM15,480

So, setiap bulan Sultan (contoh disini ialah Sultan Kedah) ialah sebanyak RM68,080.

Untuk Sultanah pulak elaun nya adalah

1. Elaun Sultanah - RM12,000 sebulan
2. Elaun peribadi Sultanah - RM2,600 sebulan.
Sebulan Sultanah akan dapat RM14,600.

Elaun lain lain untuk kerabat ialah
Raja Muda - RM13,000
Raja Puan Muda - RM5,200

Tunku Bendahara - RM4,000
Bini Tunku Bendahara - RM1,250
Tunku Temenggung - RM3,500
Isteri Tunku Temenggung - RM900

Tunku Laksamana - RM3,000
Isteri Tunku Laksamana - RM600

Banyak lagi elaun untuk kerabat bergelar.

Selain daripada tu kerabat-kerabat lain pun dapat allowances juga. Contoh macam anak anak Sultan dapat allowace dalam RM1,000 sebulan and kerabat auh sikit (bukan anak Sultan) dinamakan kerabat kategori 2 juga dapat allowace sebanyak RM500 sebulan.

Gaji dan allowances untuk Perdana Menteri, Menteri dan Ahli Parlimen

Ini semua adalah dibawah Undang-undang Ahli Parlimen (Saraan) pindaan 2005

.

Gaji untuk Perdana Menteri, Menteri, MP adalah seperti berikut,

Perdana Menteri - RM22,826.65 sebulan
Timbalan Perdana Menteri - RM18,168.15 sebulan
Menteri-menteri Kabinet - RM14,907.20 sebulan.
Timbalan Menteri-menteri Kabinet - RM10,847.65 sebulan
Setiausaha Parlimen - RM7,187.40

Ahli Dewan Negara - RM6,508.59
Ahli Dewan Rakyat (ni kira MP lah) - RM4,112.79

So, contohnya macam Pak Lah… dia adalah Perdana Menteri dan juga Menteri

Kewangan dan Menteri Keselamatan Dalam Negeri dan juga dia adalah MP, so onthly income dia ialah

= RM22,826.65 + (RM14,907.20 x 2) + RM4,112.79
= RM56,753.84.

Ini formula untuk calculate pencen bekas MP.

Pencen:
1/144 x tempoh perkhidmatan (bulan) x Gaji
Minimum pencen dapat ialah separuh dari gaji MP. Bermakna kalau jadi MP atu penggal pun akan dapat pencen paling sikit pun RM2,056.40. Lagi lama jadi MP lagi banyak pencen dia akan dapat.

Gratuity:
1/48 x Gaji x 12 x tempoh perkhidmatan (bulan)

Popularity: 63% [?]

Who is Mahathir Kutty?

Liberal Politica No Comments »

Mahathir Kutty, a Tamil Muslim descendent, the forgotten real identity of Tun Mahathir

An UntoldCityLife.com’s Liberal Politica Review written by Xiao Loong Zi

Nuffnang ads

The letter “M” under “UMNO” (United Malays National Organization) is “Malays” (worst still “Money”), a political party formed to protect the interest of Malays  (in actual fact to protect those in powers to suck the wealth of the nation). They created a non existent “Malay Supremacy” or “Ketuanan Melayu”. However, to become a Malay in Malaysia is not based on biological but rather political . Not many people aware that our beloved ex-Prime Miniter Tun Mahathir was actually origin from a Tamil Muslim descendent. His original name was Mahathir Kutty s/o Mohamed Iskandar Kutty. His father was considered as a mamak muslim, a supporter of the pro-Axis Indian National Army leader, Subash Chandra Bose. Among the blogger community, Tun Mahathir is often referred as “Si Mahathir Kutty”, “Indian Malay Mahathir”, “Mamak Malay Mahathir”. His orang kampung friends who studied in Singapore with him knew about this, so as his name used in Singapore during college. When he was the Prime Minister of Malaysia for 22 years, he was also referred as “Firaun” or “Mahafiraun” who controlled the entire  nation.

Popularity: 72% [?]

Senior-level managers of Chinese, Indians and others will jobless soon in Malaysia

Liberal Politica No Comments »

Senior-level staff based on the quota of 45% Malays, 35% Chinese, 17% Indians and 3% others……

An UntoldCityLife.com’s Liberal Politica Review written by Xiao Loong Zi




Many people were asking what this “Inculcating Corporate Social Responsibility” is all about when our Perdana Menteri Abdulla Badawi announced it during the Budget 2008. To be effective by 1st January 2008, all Public Listed Companies are required to disclose their employment composition by race and gender as well as programmes understaken to develop domestic and Bumiputera vendors. That is so-called “Good Corporate Social Responsibility” in a political correct manner by the government.

To my great surprise, recently 3 small “little napoleons” instructed 3 MNC companies to hire their employees based on below quota:

All senior-level staff must be based on the quota of 45% Malays, 35% Chinese, 17% Indians and 3% others ….

What if consequence 1: What will happen if the MNCs refused to do so?

=> Very unlikely as the MNCs are owned by foreigners who seek investment ROI, most probably these MNCs will just go ahead to implement such policy entirely in Malaysia

What if consequence 2: What will happen if the MNCs follow to do so?

=> Very likely that these MNCs will get benefits in kind from the government!

What if consequence 3: What will happen to you if you are Malays?

=> Congratulations, you will be promoted and get richer not because you are extremely capable (maybe some but not all or majority) but because of this policy.

*Disclaimer: I am a right-mindful “color-blind” and not a racist for above statement.

What if consequence 4: What will happen to you if you are non-Malays?

=> Sorry, the MNCs will have to get rid of you as you are damaging expensive and high TURNOVER cost to operate. You will jobless, get lesser salary, sell your house and car and be poorer a bit. But not to worry, if you work and prove yourself, you still can be squeeze yourself into the 35% for Chinese, 17% for Indians and 3% for others.

According to Human Resources Minister Datuk Seri Dr Fong Chan Onn and Health Minister Datuk Dr Chua Soi Lek, they said that they have not so far heard of such report (Sin Chew Jit Poh already published on front page loh). However, they both said that they would bring the issue to the cabinet if it is found truth.

Let’s be a right-mindful Malaysian to react!!

The current radical racist politicians are destroying our forefather Tunku Abdul Rahman’s vision in setting up a “color-blind” society that is fair and equal. See my previous post on “Tunku”, a political propaganda play! http://untoldcitylife.com/index.php/2007/09/15/what-is-50th-year-of-merdeka-to-you/

Popularity: 50% [?]

Malaysian Indian Lawyers are sueing British Government for USD 4 Trillion (also Malaysian Government & Umno?)

Liberal Politica 1 Comment »

Sue the British Government (possible also Malaysian Government & Umno) by Malaysian Indian Lawyers

An UntoldCityLife.com’s Liberal Politica Review written by Xiao Loong Zi



Below is a public annoucement from HINDRAF (Hindu Rights Action Force) extracted from http://www.policewatchmalaysia.com/. A very daring & yet sensitive initiative for Hindu Rights by Malaysian Indian Lawyers in conjuction 50th Years of Merdeka of Malaysia. 4 major issues are shown below annoucement:

Forum 6.10.2007: USD 4 Trillion suit against United Kingdom government
HINDRAF
Hindu Rights Action Force
No. 135-3-A, Jalan Toman 7,
Kemayan Square,
70200 Seremban, Negeri Sembilan
Malaysia. Tel : 06-7672995/6
Fax: 06-7672997 Email waytha@hotmail.comPUBLIC FORUM
6.10.2007 (SATURDAY)RE: 1. FORUM ON USD 4 TRILLION (INCLUDING RM7 MILLION PER MALAYSIAN INDIAN) CIVIL SUIT AGAINST THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT FILED ON 30.8.2007.2. 50 YEARS OF MARGINALIZATION OF THE MALAYSIAN INDIANS BY THE UMNO CONTROLLED MALAYSIAN GOVERNMENT.

3. NO ALLOCATION IN THE 2008 BUDGET FOR THE INDIAN POOR AND FOR ALL 523 TAMIL SCHOOLS, HINDU TEMPLES AND CREMATORIUMS (ALSO INDISCRIMINATELY DEMOLISHED) BUT ALLOCATIONS HAVE BEEN MADE FOR ALMOST ALL OTHER POOR COMMUNITIES IN MALAYSIA.

4. MR.P.WAYTHA MOORTHY (HINDRAF CHAIRMAN) WHO FILED THIS CIVIL SUIT FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE 2 MILLION MALAYSIAN INDIANS IN LONDON ON 30.8.2007 IE ON THE EVE OF MALAYSIA’S 50TH YEAR GOLDEN JUBILEE INDEPENDENCE CELEBRATIONS WOULD SPEAK ON THIS SUIT, THE PEACEFUL ASSEMBLY BY THE HINDU HUMAN RIGHTS OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OUTSIDE THE MALAYSIAN HIGH COMMISSION IN LONDON ON 30.8.2007, HIS MEETINGS WITH NGOS’ IN LONDON, NEW YORK AND WASHINGTON AND MEETINGS WITH UNITED STATES SENATOR BARBARA BOXER OF THE U.S. FOREIGN RELATIONS COMMITTEE AND OTHER CONGRESSMEN AND SENATORS’ SECRETARIES OF THE U.S HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND CONGRESS HUMAN RIGHTS CAUCAS, FREEDOM OF RELIGION AND FOREIGN RELATIONS COMMITTEE.

LAWYERS: 1. M.MANOHARAN (CHAIR)
2. P.UTHAYAKUMAR
3. K.KENGHADHARAN
4. P.WATHA MOORTHY
5. S.GANAPATI RAO

DATE: 6.10.2007 (SATURDAY)

TIME: 6.30P.M

VENUE: SRJK (C) KAMPUNG BARU SEMENYIH, SELANGOR
SCHOOL HALL

ORGANIZED BY: Hindraf (www.policewatchmalaysia.com)
Tel: 019-3718451, 03-22825241

Thank You.
Yours Faithfully,

P. Uthayakumar 013-3504711
Legal Adviser



Popularity: 61% [?]

Full Transcript/ BBC-Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar

Liberal Politica 1 Comment »

Extracted from a forwarded email and sharing by AverageJoe of UntoldCityLife.com



Full Transcript
(Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar’s comments in bold.)

Sarah Montague:
Malaysia has just celebrated the 50th anniversary of its independence from Britain , and there is much to celebrate. Living standards have improved immeasurably over the past five decades, and the economy is doing well. But race is increasingly becoming a problem. A third of the population are ethnic Chinese or Indian. And they are becoming increasingly frustrated at the systematic discrimination they suffer. My guest today is the country’s Foreign Minister.

[music]

Datuk Seri Syed Hamid Albar, welcome to HARDtalk.

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar: Thank you very much.

Sarah Montague: Is it time to change Malaysia ’s laws and treat everyone the same?

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar:
When you talking about, looking at everyone, we’re looking at nation building. The most important thing is Malaysians feel they are Malaysians. To recognise our diversity as a source of our strength, there is no need for us to change the laws so long as we’re able to exercise the unity, we’re able to act as Malaysians. And I think this is happening, the process of nation building is not a short process. We came from a very divided society that was recognised by economic functions, living at a very poor living standard. So I think we have tackled the issues in a way that will bring peace and stability, at the same time people are able to share prosperity of the country. And this is happening..

Sarah Montague:
But there were laws that were originally brought in to help Malays, who were… basically to tackle poverty. There might have been some justification for them at some time, but since poverty has been tackled, the illiteracy is eradicated, what’s the justification for treating generations-old… ethnic Chinese and Indians who’ve been in Malaysia for generations; why should they be treated differently now?

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar:
I think when you’re looking at it from a detached point of view, you might be seeing it in that way. But if you look at it in reality, what is happening is that the economic growth of the non-Malays is faster after the New Economic Policy than before it. The share of the economic cake, is bigger, deeper and wider than before, so it is not as if you’re looking at a theoretical, conceptual thing, you’re looking at the realities on the ground. And the realities on the ground, if you look at the household income, between Malays, Chinese and Indians, even the Indians have got better household income than the Malays. So I think if you take it out of its ethnic dimension, then you will see that it is the function of any government to have the less fortunate, to make sure the divide that is based on ethnic division can be overcome. And I think we have done that quite successfully…

Sarah Montague:
Let’s take a look at access to universities. Is it fair that it’s easier for Malays to get to universities than it is for ethnic Indians or Chinese?

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar:
I think the question, maybe at the beginning, I think it is the same thing in UK or any country that starts to build a nation. When you start to build a nation, when you see the disparity, the education opportunities, what we wanted to do was to create the opportunity. How do you avoid seeing people who are living in the rural areas with less facilities, how…

Sarah Montague:
… but you don’t have that problem any longer it’s difficult to justify..

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar:

We do have.. we have.. At present it is based on merit, it is based on merit, and I think if you look at the university, our democrisation of the education, you have to look in total, the number of students in Malaysia . I think people who see it from outside will try to aggravate the situation and say ‘Oh there is disparity between..

Sarah Montague:
But it doesn’t just seem.. but it doesn’t just seem to be people from outside who are saying this, people within.. it is ethnic Indians and Chinese in Malaysia …

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar:
I think you have to look at it this way.. I think without me getting excited about it, or emotional about it, looking at it in a fair balance; if you look in terms of total number of students of all universities in Malaysia, there are still more non-Malays than the Malays. And this should not be an issue that divides us. I think ultimately we have done, we have tackled all issues step by step, and it is working. I think for Malaysia it is working. Wherever we see that there is disparity.. At one time scholarships were given to Malays; government scholarships were given to Malays. Now it is open to non-Malays also. So all these things are happening, but we must dismantle..

Sarah Montague: But what about government contracts…

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar:
For your information, the contracts that are enjoyed by the Chinese in absolute terms, and the non-Malays, is bigger than even the Malays. If I have a piece of land that is one acre in a rural area, that one piece of acre of land, may be valued at RM10,000, or it’s about US$3,000. But if I have got a ten thousand square feet of land, in the urban area, that will cost millions. So we do not look at that.. We are building a nation, a nation that has been left divided, been recognised through economic activities, now there is building on common factors amongst us.

Sarah Montague: But do you not accept that you are in danger.. that there is rising resentment among ethnic Indians and Chinese because of this situation.. it is persisting when they don’t see that it needs to persist any longer..

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar:
I think there is a lot more discussion, open discussion, but you do not misinterpret that open discussion among the races is something negative. It shows that the nation has reached the stage of maturity. We’re questioning things that before we have taken for granted. The Chinese are looking at what more can they get, the Indians are looking how they could improve; I’m not saying that there is no problem, but for outsiders to come and tell us, ‘Ohh you’re going.. there is going to be racial tension, there is going to be problem..’ No. I think you just witnessed the 50th anniversary of independence. I think there is that sense of belonging and ownership. It is up to the Malaysians to subsequently to dismantle whatever they consider is necessary…

Sarah Montague: … how is it that ethnic Indians and Chinese feel a sense of belonging when they’re, right from the very top, they can’t get access to the top Cabinet posts?

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar: Who told you that?

Sarah Montague: When was the last time a senior Cabinet post was held by an ethnic Indian or Chinese?

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar: What do you mean by ’senior Cabinet post’?

Sarah Montague: Since 1973, the top Cabinet posts: Prime Minister, Deputy, Home Affairs, Internal Security, Defense, Foreign, Finance, Education, Trade and International Trade.. 1973 is the last time any of those posts was held by a non-Malay..

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar: I can argue the same thing with so many countries, I can argue the same thing..

Sarah Montague: We’re not.. we’re not talking about other countries, we’re talking about Malaysia . Other countries can deal with their problems of their own. How would you deal.. Do you recognise that is a problem? You talk about sharing power, there is..

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar:
No no let me talk to you in a way that is most… that you do not get excited… that you do not get upset about something that you do not understand. Let me tell you this: Whenever we want to do something, it is important for us to look at other countries. That’s where we learn, that’s how we leapfrog. Democracy does not come by itself, it comes because we look at the examples of other places. So let me say that, in the case that, the most important thing is, there will come a time when the Chinese, the Indians and the other races in Malaysia have accepted that arrangement; how can somebody from outside come to tell us, ‘Ohh..’

Sarah Montague: You mean…

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar: They have accepted..

Sarah Montague: .. you mean this situation is fine because nobody is saying anything in Malaysia about it..

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar:
No no.. not nobody is saying. If they are able to.. if the Opposition, if they’re able.. or the Chinese parties decide to get together and to change that thing, there is nothing under the law to stop it. That is what I’m saying..

Sarah Montague: Do you not think it’s a little odd that all the senior posts… in the Cabinet in the last 30 years have been held by a non-Malay?

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar:
I don’t think… I don’t think so. This is a democratic system. Each one of them have agreed in the coalition to work together. It is well and good for somebody to say that ‘All this.. it should not be’, I don’t think we’re going to be told how it should be..

Sarah Montague: There is outside… there is inside Malaysia who say this.. this social contract is actually State racism. What do you say to that?

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar:
Oh. I can say the worse about Israeli State racism; in our case we don’t have that provision. You have to look at it in, I think, objectively. I don’t think it is right to look at Malaysia as a racist country. I don’t think it is right. You should see how the infusion of cultures, the getting together, the people get along together.. Yes you can find there are.. people who disagree with it.. there are certain things that people say ‘Ah it’s not perfect,’.. I would be the last person that say this is a perfect situation, but I think we have succeeded in building a multiracial society out of our diversity. We have succeeded in bringing the whole of the Malaysian community, even against the diverse backgrounds, together, to work together. There will come a time… that… if it is the choice of the people, because one person is one vote..

Sarah Montague: When do you think that time will come..

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar: … That is up to the voters…

Sarah Montague:
Because there are plenty of people outside Malaysia , who look at it, and let’s take a look at investors, because [while you] think, ‘Look it’s absolutely fine,’ there are those who would invest in Malaysia , but choose not to do so. And here’s an emerging markets fund manager. He’s cashed out most of his fund investments in Malaysia , because he said, ‘The problem is that the Malays would do a lot better as well if there weren’t the restrictions. They’ve got the resources, they’ve got the people; they’re just not harnessing them in the right way.’ And he suggests that you roll back those measures, to encourage entrepreneurial energy. And that was Mark Mobius, who’s the fund manager with Franklin Templeton.

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar:
I think what he’s saying, if you do not… If there are ten fund managers, there is one fund manager that say in that way, then I think he is entitled to his own view. But the majority of fund managers find that Malaysia is a good place for investment, it is a good place that gives good returns on investment; the Malaysian economy has grown because of foreign investment..

Sarah Montague: But why has it not grown as much as other countries in the area..

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar:
I think they’re quite happy that it has grown for the last.. If you look at it from double digit, now we have grown about 6 percent, so it’s not a bad growth..

Sarah Montague: … But it’s slowing and your neighbouring countries are growing faster.

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar:

No there are times that our neighbouring countries grow slower, and we grow faster. I mean, you can’t take… one particular moment and say ‘Oh this is growing faster, therefore it is because of..’, I tell you..I can actually give all sorts of clarifications if I want to, on so many things. But I think you have to look at it; have we succeeded in creating peace and stability, in generating prosperity among the races, have we succeeded in trying to infuse culture out of our diversity; we are better off than many other countries..

Sarah Montague: But my question is, will it continue to do so?

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar:
I think it will. I am not in the same position like you are… look at it negatively. I am a Malaysian. My love for my country, my commitment to my country, I would say yes. I am not going to allow any foreigners to tell me, ‘Oh this is going to break’. No I will not allow that.

Sarah Montague: A recent survey on race relations in Malaysia found that 34 percent of those who were asked had never had a meal with citizens of other races. The lives of different races within Malaysia are now so divided that, that you have different races - they learn in separate schools, they eat separately, they work separately, they socialise separately - does that worry you?

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar:
If that happens like the way you say, of course it worries us. That’s why we have been addressing the racial issues. We talk about among ourselves, I do not know whether you [?] realise or not, we talk about the danger of polarisation, the danger of us looking at ourselves separately, of course we tackle these problems. But we recognise, it can exist. But we have got a desire of tackling those issues. It’s not we are saying, you know try to brush everything under the carpet and think, ‘Oh it doesn’t exist’. What exists, we recognise. But it is not.. it is not as if we are not doing something..

Sarah Montague: But why is society is becoming increasingly divided? The Crown Prince of Perak makes the point that in his boyhood, the different races mixed more freely. He says some Malay-majority schools have made the girls wear headscarves… … people to avoid non-Malay homes. He points to the fact that lives are being lived more separately, increasingly so.

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar:
I think that’s a very good comment that he has made. He is as much responsible as all of us are. All of us have to find a way… that means we have identified the problems that we have… the fact that a person wears a headscarf does not make a person an extreme. What we want to avoid, is extreme behaviour, whether of faith or culture, or of customs. We need to work together. I think the most important thing, you know Sarah, if I can tell you, is to understand the issues and then try to address them. Not to look at the issues, and say that, ‘Oh it’s getting worse.’ There is this problem, we need to tackle those problem. I’m not saying that there is no problem. That is the very thing that you are saying..

Sarah Montague: .. the fact that it is getting worse, and when I quote the Crown Prince … uhh… the prominent historian Khoo Kay Kim says, ‘It is becoming increasingly difficult for the peoples of various ethnic groups to participate in common activity.’

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar:
No, I think this is what the Malaysians have addressed. All of us are talking about it. It’s not something that is alien, that you are telling me that this exists; we know that.

Sarah Montague: But it is getting worse. Do you not accept it is getting worse?

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar:
No, I think there is relations all over the world, is getting worse. Polarisation all over the world is getting worse. But it does not mean you should give up. We know it exists, but we want to take steps to overcome them. That’s why, our current government, is giving the opportunity, for everyone to talk about it. And then try to provide solutions. One of the things that we have done in the Merdeka celebrations is to make that sense of participation, that every race… Because we know there is that problem of polarisation, division… People leaving go to Chinese schools, go to Tamil schools, they don’t mix with each other; so all these, we are handling and tackling them. I am not going to take…

Sarah Montague: What are you plan to do about the schools then, the fact that…

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar:
The schools, we need to overcome the problem of sensitivities. We wanted to establish the integrated schools, where everyone, studying their language, their … medium of instruction, under one school. But here in this particular case, the Chinese does not want. They want a separate school of their own. So now what we have done, in the national schools, we have brought in the… you can study Chinese, you can study Tamil, you can study other ethnic… You know you can’t get that in other places. You know some… I think, we recognise their problems, but it is not a problem we cannot overcome.

Sarah Montague: Article 11 of the Malaysian Constitution says ‘every person has the right to profess and practise his religion’. Increasingly, that seems to be becoming meaningless. Is it?

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar:
I don’t think so. I don’t agree with you. You’re talking about practising their own religion.. you know, Malaysia is one of the places that you can see the practice of multi-religions, and all religions exist in Malaysia . But if you’re talking about, you know, converting one person to… That is a different issue entirely…

Sarah Montague: Why is a Muslim, and there have been some high-profile cases, perhaps one of the most high-profile - Lina Joy, a Malay woman. She tried to convert to Christianity and she wasn’t allowed to.

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar:
I think you have made the whole thing… turn into something that is negative. Lina Joy wanted to change her name; she was never not allowed to convert to Christianity or whatever religion that she has chosen. But a person is born, with an identity card; there is a system that we have in Malaysia , the ID. And that ID you want to change, that creates problems. It is nothing to do with the fact that nobody has arrested her and forced her to become a Muslim, to convert to become a Muslim. But the court decided, on the basis that, you cannot change your name in the ID. But she has got her own choice, she has made her own choice, in wanting to be what she has chosen. I don’t think we stop that.

Sarah Montague: So anybody can convert. Let’s take the case of Revathi Masoosai. Now she was a Muslim-born Malaysian woman, who was sent to an Islamic rehabilitation centre for six months, because she tried to live as a Hindu.

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar:
[pause] I think that happens all the time, for a Muslim, you have to look at the diversity.. If you are a Muslim, you are converted or you choose to convert - we see whether that conversion is being done, she has entered into another religion voluntarily or not, then she will have that right, the choice, the option to decide on her own. I think … out of 5 million Malaysians, or there are about 12 million Malaysians who have profess certain religions, and there are two or three cases; I don’t think it represents the whole country. And there are quite a number of issues that are more important, bigger than what you are describing, but if you describe out of one, then it becomes the whole picture. I don’t think that is right.

Sarah Montague: It’s.. it’s important because it shows what the State is doing, it shows how it could affect other individuals. I mean, if you take her case, why could she not practise as a Hindu?
Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar:
She has decided.. If ultimately she has decided to become a Hindu, that’s up to her.

Sarah Montague: .. But she had to go through what she has gone…

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar: She is a Muslim.

Sarah Montague: Six months rehabilitation, she says it was like a prison. They say it’s a school, but it’s actually like a prison.

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar: Yah, out of the how many Muslim women that got converted to Hindus?

Sarah Montague: She…

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar:
You are.. you know she came out, and she said that is what had happened. Have they proceeded against her? They have not proceeded against her. She has.. they want to make sure that…

Sarah Montague: She now has to live with her mother in order to see her child.

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar: To see her child… whether…

Sarah Montague: She has a child with the Hindu man.

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar:
You know, if you follow a certain religion, like you are a member of a certain club, you are subject to certain rules. When you want to get out of that club, then you must make sure you follow that rule in getting out of it. But nobody is going to stop anyone, who so strongly profess a certain religion, they want to change to another religion, that’s up to them. But it does create… misunderstanding, between people, between religions. Malaysia we have survived, because we have kept …that, that compartment [?], rather than… you know.. the various religions living, practising… without interference. If you see in Malaysia , there are more… Malaysia practises more freedom than even in this country.

Sarah Montague: But these cases are used… are used as examples of where people fear a creeping Islamisation of Malaysia.

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar:
I think there is.. there is that prejudice rather than creeping Islamisation. You must remember that in the Constitution, Islam is the official religion of Malaysia . You know.. that at the same time, we have got per capita population, we have got so many…

Sarah Montague: But is it an Islamic State?

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar: It is an Islamic State.

Sarah Montague: It is, or is not?

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar:
… but it is not a theocratic Islamic State. We have said that. You know because we, as far as we are concerned, we do not see the separation you know, the old rule - the separation of church and State, as something that is applicable to us. We do not stop people building churches, there are so many churches in Malaysia , more than wherever you can find…

Sarah Montague: But you have Syariah Courts operating…

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar: Syariah Court is up to the Muslims.

Sarah Montague: Only for the Muslims?

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar:
It’s for the Muslims. It’s not.. it’s… you know please don’t.. don’t get…

Sarah Montague: But you have this system because of the amendment in 1988, where there seems to be confusion over when Syariah Law applies, and when…

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar:
I think that.. that.. I know that you have looked at certain parts of it, and then you try to dissect it. Okay. When there is… on matters pertaining to Syariah, the jurisdiction is given to the Syariah Court . On matters pertaining to Syariah, if there is any conflict between the two laws - between the Syariah and our civil laws - it is for the courts to decide. But this is done in the courts. It is.. we use the rule of law in order to determine right and to determine which law is applicable. And I think that is the correct way of approaching the subject. Malaysia is not an easy country to govern. It is easier for commentators to say ‘This is wrong. This is wrong.. this is wrong,’ but I think that you have to live in it, to see how to govern the country. And I think overall, we are very happy in what is happening in our country, and whatever weaknesses, we will overcome them.

Sarah Montague:
When your Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi became prime minister, he promised to do a number of things, not least tackle corruption. And yet, a survey by PERC (Editor’s Note: Political and Economic Risk Consultancy), which is a Hong Kong-based consultancy, showed that corruption is perceived to have worsened in Malaysia this year. Does he accept that you have a lot more to do?

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar:
Yes, I think we agree with that. We have to do a lot more in terms of ensuring good governance, ensuring that our fight against corruption can be overcome. I think this is a perennial problem that needs to be tackled, and that has to be tackled with the law, as well as with education, that is why we have established the Integrity.. the Institute of Integrity , in order to inculcate that sense of good governance, values - which is necessary, sense of morality.. When we have problems, we identify them, and we try to tackle them.

Sarah Montague: It is not going as fast as you would hope. Do you accept that?

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar:
I think in some areas it is slow, in some areas it is… moving in the right direction. But there are.. there are problems.

Sarah Montague:
Datuk Seri Syed Hamid Albar, many thanks.

Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar:
Thank you very much, thank you.

Popularity: 55% [?]

Information Minister Datuk Seri Zainuddin Maidin said “…Bar Council should act professionally…”

Liberal Politica No Comments »

Information Minister Datuk Seri Zainuddin Maidin commented on Bar Council’s “Walk for Justice”

An UntoldCityLife.com’s Liberal Politica Review written by Xiao Loong Zi



The “Walk for Justice” on 26 Sept 2006 by more than 1000 lawyers and social activists (my lawyer friend said more than 2500 people) is actually considered unprofessional according to our Information Minister Datuk Seri Zainuddin Maidin last Thursday ago.

Instead of pressuring the government to form a Royal Commission to investigate the “video clip scandal of fixing judges”, a commission should be setup to investigate the unprofessional conduct of the Bar Council’s leaders who organized the “Walk for Justice”.

The Information Minister also said that Bar Council should not be influenced by politics to remain as a respectable professional body.

First of all, I salute the Bar Council members and their leaders (especially President Ambiga Sreenevasan) to create the awareness of what is happening to our jurisdication system. And, I fully and completely supporting them to represent the voices of Malaysians to fight for justice.

The comments made by our Information Minister sound very insulting to all the lawyers as well as citizens who participated in “Walk for Justice”. I personally do not know well of this Minister nor do I know how qualifying he is as a Minister. However, from his comments, he does not sound like representing the entire nation but very much of his political party. Instead of giving his professional answer, he gave political influenced answer.

When the lawyers march, something is wrong! Save our judiciary! Selamatkan Badan Kehakiman Malaysia!



Popularity: 55% [?]

Emergency General Meeting called by Ambiga Sreenevasan, President of Malaysian Bar Council

Liberal Politica No Comments »

The Bar Council Chairman, Ambiga Sreenevasan’s ”Walk for Justice” has inspired many Malaysians. She is now calling for an emergency General Meeting among Bar Council members to re-affirm the supremacy of the Federal Constitution and the application of the Common Law in Malaysia. All right-minded Malaysian should pay great attention as someone is trying to replace our existing Federal Constitution and Common Law with Syriah law!

An UntoldCityLife.com’s Liberal Politica Review written by Xiao Loong Zi



The 1st step to restore the Jurisdiction of Malaysia (Selamatkan Badan Kehakiman Malaysia) was taken by the Bar Council Chairman, Ambiga Sreenevasan’s “Walk for Justice” on 26 September 2007. (Please see previous post on “Save the Jurisdiction System of Malaysia - Selamatkan Badan Kehakiman Malaysia “)

Ambiga Sreenevasan, our hero the “Peoples’ Judge”, was giving a closing speech during “Walk of Justice” under the rain

Ambiga Sreenevasan Photo by CHUA SUE ANN

Now, she is calling an Emergency General Meeting to re-affirm the supremacy of the existing Federal Constitution and the application of the Common Law. Many of our existing Malaysian laws are actually based on the long and well-established British common law system, however, some radical politicians and corrupted high-ranking judges outside there are trying to replace our existing law system with Syriah law.

Please read the PRESS RELEASE written by Ambiga Sreenevasan to all Bar Council Members:

—————————————————————————>

The Bar Council notes with alarm and dismay the support for the proposal to replace the common law system in this country. The suggestion from some quarters now appears to be that it be replaced gradually with the Syariah law system. (Click here to poll: “Should the Bar Council convene an EGM to reaffirm the supremacy of the Federal Constitution and the application of the Common Law?” Only registered members may poll.)

The Bar Council is deeply concerned that these statements are made with no apparent understanding of, or respect for, the system of law that operates in this country under the Federal Constitution. What we have after 50 years of Merdeka is the Malaysian common law built up painstakingly by Parliament and the Malaysian Judiciary. Thus it differs in many respects from the common law in other jurisdictions by virtue of its development locally. It was not built overnight. Citizens, organisations, local and foreign businesses, all conduct their affairs in Malaysia based on the common law system. All this will become meaningless if the common law system is replaced. Why is there this sudden need to change a system that has worked so well in Malaysia and that will continue to work well for hundreds of years as it has in other jurisdictions? The proponents of this change have not put forward a single cogent or credible argument for it.

We must be mindful of our Constitutional and legal history that has resulted in the development of our Malaysian common law. Against this background it is irresponsible for those entrusted with administering our law (and who are schooled in the common law) as well as for those in power, to call for a change for no valid reason. There appears to be little appreciation of the full ramifications of their suggestions and the effect this will have on Malaysia locally and internationally and on investor confidence in this country.

Let there be no mistake. Any attempt to dismantle the common law system is a direct attack on our Federal Constitution. It is a backdoor attempt to rewrite it and to move Malaysia towards becoming a theocratic state which our founding fathers and recently our Prime Minister have recognised we are not. It violates the social contract. That it comes from those who ought to uphold the law and Constitution is all the more regrettable.

We are on the brink of 50 years of Merdeka. We are in an era of globalisation. Instead of seeking to displace a system that has earned the respect of the international community and that has united our people, we ought to address what truly ails our system of justice. And it is certainly not the Malaysian common law.

Ambiga Sreenevasan
President
Malaysia Bar

—————————————————————————>

All readers, please provide your support to Ambiga Sreenevasan if required in the future. What can we do now is to raise public awareness and express your objection. And perhaps if there will be another “Walk for Justice”, you may want to participate in it :).

 



Popularity: 63% [?]


Copyright © 2007 UntoldCityLife.com. All rights reserved.